1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 776 A.2d
  5. 776 A.2d 4 (2001)
 

WILLIAMS v. HOFMANN BALANCING TECHNIQUES, LTD.

No. 1214, Sept. Term, 2000.

776 A.2d 4 (2001)

139 Md. App. 339

John E. WILLIAMS, Jr. v. HOFMANN BALANCING TECHNIQUES, LTD. et al.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

July 5, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie Hayes Russo (Paul D. Beckman, Israelson, Salsbury, Clements & Beckman, L.L.C., Baltimore, and Robert Wendt, Joel A. Pool and Holloran, Wendt & McMath, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, on the brief), for appellant.

Michael A. Brown (Troy A. Priest and Brown, Diffenderffer & Kearney, L.L.P., on the brief), Baltimore, for appellees, Hofmann and Perfect Hofmann U.S.A.

George M. Church (Marisa A. Trasatti and Church & Houff, P.A., on the brief), Baltimore for appellee, Perfect Equipment Corp.

Argued before JAMES R. EYLER, KRAUSER, and ROBERT L. KARWACKI (Ret., specially assigned), JJ.

JAMES R. EYLER, Judge.

This case presents the issue of whether an amended complaint, for purposes of the statute of limitations, relates back to the date of filing of the original complaint. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City held that it did not and entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We disagree, vacate the judgment, and hold that the amendment does relate back to the date of filing of the original complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases