Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People improperly bolstered identification testimony by introducing evidence that the eyewitnesses had also identified the defendant's accomplice, who was not on trial, is unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, any error in admitting this evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v Crimmins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
