1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 111 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 111 Cal.Rptr.2d 662 (2001)
 

CITY OF STOCKTON v. ALBERT BROCCHINI FARMS

No. C034813.

111 Cal.Rptr.2d 662 (2001)

92 Cal.App.4th 193

CITY OF STOCKTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ALBERT BROCCHINI FARMS, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

September 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard K. Denhalter, City Attorney, Barbara J. Anderson, Assistant City Attorney; Freeman, D'Aiuto, Pierce & Gurev and Maxwell M. Freeman, Ronald J. D'Aiuto, Stockton, Thomas H. Keeling, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Brown, Hall, Shore & McKinley and John H. McKinley, Stockton, for Defendant and Appellant.

DAVIS, J.

Plaintiff City of Stockton (City) moved to exclude the testimony of the valuation expert for defendant Albert Brocchini Farms, Inc., in this action for eminent domain. The trial court found the expert's opinion did not have a sufficient factual basis and excluded it. The defendant then stipulated to entry of judgment at the value that the plaintiffs experts assigned. On appeal, the defendant argues the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases