1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 107 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 664 (2001)
 

OTTO v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.

No. B141388.

107 Cal.Rptr.2d 664 (2001)

89 Cal.App.4th 985

Kevin OTTO et al, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al, Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

As Modified June 7, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lackie & Dammeier, Dieter C. Dammeier, Rancho Cucamonga, and Michael A. Morguess, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Belinda D. Stith, for Defendants and Respondents.

CROSKEY, J.

In this appeal, we decide the question whether a written memorandum, which documents a meeting between a public safety officer and his supervisor and which is placed in the officer's personnel file, qualifies as punitive action and warrants the administrative appeal provided for in Government Code sections 3303 and 3304.1 The trial court ruled that such written memoranda placed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases