1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 259 F.3d
  5. 259 F.3d 503 (2001)
 

U.S. v. CROZIER

Nos. 99-6561, 99-6567, 99-6629.

259 F.3d 503 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Earl Crozier; Charles W. Burton, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: August 2, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Randall E. Reagan, LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS, Knoxville, Tennessee, Gary W. Lanker, LAW OFFICE OF GARY W. LANKER, Memphis, Tennessee, for Defendants. Steve H. Cook, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Plaintiff.

ON BRIEF: Randall E. Reagan, LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS, Knoxville, Tennessee, Gary W. Lanker, LAW OFFICE OF GARY W. LANKER, Memphis, Tennessee, for Defendants. Steve H. Cook, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Plaintiff.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MOORE, Circuit Judge; O'MALLEY, District Judge.

MARTIN, C. J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. O'MALLEY, D. J. (pp. 27-29), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge.

Following a bench trial, the district court found David Earl Crozier and Charles W. Burton guilty of conspiracy to distribute and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Additionally, the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases