IN THE MATTER OF PEIRCE AND PEIRCE

No. 99-323.

146 N.H. 611 (2001)

IN THE MATTER OF MARK W. PEIRCE AND JOY N. PEIRCE

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

July 13, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Macoul, of Salem, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

Marshall Law Offices, of East Kingston (Keri J. Marshall on the brief and orally), for the defendant.


BROCK, C.J.

The plaintiff, Mark W. Peirce, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Abramson, J.) denying his request to modify support obligations to which he had previously stipulated. See RSA 458-C:7 (Supp. 2000). We reverse and remand.

The following facts were adduced at the hearing before the trial court. In November 1995, the trial court entered a no fault divorce between the plaintiff and the defendant, Joy N. Peirce. Prior to this decree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases