ANDERSON v. CITY OF COKATO

No. C3-01-265.

631 N.W.2d 121 (2001)

Harlan ANDERSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF COKATO, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 25, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry J. Peterson, Larry J. Peterson & Associates, St. Paul, MN, (for appellant).

George C. Hoff, Paula A. Callies, Hoff, Barry & Kuderer, P.A., Eden Prairie, MN, (for respondent).

Considered and decided by HARTEN, Presiding Judge, PARKER and FOLEY, Judges.


OPINION

PARKER, Judge

Appellant Harlan Anderson challenges the district court's determination that Minn.Stat. § 117.195, subd. 2 (2000), did not provide a remedy for appellant when the condemning authority changed its purpose for condemning appellant's former land. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent City of Cokato petitioned for condemnation of appellant Harlan Anderson's entire tract of real estate for the purpose of storm water management...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases