Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly rejected the appellant's finding that the petitioner's use of the property was not a permissible continuation of a preexisting legal nonconforming use (see, Rogers v Association for Help of Retarded Children,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.