1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 16 P.3d
  5. 16 P.3d 729 (2001)
 

WHITESIDES v. U-HAUL CO. OF ALASKA

No. S-9204.

16 P.3d 729 (2001)

William O. WHITESIDES, Appellant, v. U-HAUL COMPANY OF ALASKA, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

January 19, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Havelock, Law Offices of John E. Havelock, Anchorage, for Appellant.

Laura L. Farley, Le Gros, Buchanan & Paul, Anchorage, for Appellee.

Before FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

William Whitesides sued U-Haul Company of Alaska for overtime wages, claiming that the company improperly classified his field manager job as administrative, which the Alaska Wage and Hour Act exempts from overtime pay. The superior court denied summary judgment to Whitesides and submitted his claim to a jury, which ruled for U-Haul. We reverse. To qualify as an exempt administrative employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases