In re: Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation Frederick E. Tonnies; William M. Leonhardt; David S. Kahl; Robert E. Wilt; Clay A. Bernichon; Solveig Tschann; Frederick W. Horpe; Ludson F. Worsham; Edwin Marjala; Kenyon T. Bement; Donald E. Wagner; Lucius O. Browne, Donald F. Fabry; Thomas L. Durkin; Bernard J. Hart; Ronald R. Bennett; Herman Hein; Donald L. Thompson, individually and on behalf of all members of the Sperry, Burroughs and Unisys Classes Appellants.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued: July 18, 2000.
Filed March 9, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Arnold Levin, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Philadelphia, PA, Joseph A. Golden, Carl B. Downing, Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz, Southfield, MI, 48075, Bryan L. Clobes, Miller, Faucher, Cafferty & Wexler, One Penn Square West, Suite 2500, Philadelphia, PA 19102, Seymour J. Mansfield, Mansfield & Tanick, 900 Second Avenue South, Suite 1560, Minneapolis, MN 55402, Sarah E. Siskind, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, 44 East Miffline Street, Suite 803, Madison, WI 53703, Henry H. Rossbacher, Rossbacher & Associates, 445 South Flower Street, Citibank Center, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Charles Gottlieb Gottlieb & Goren, 30150 Telegraph, Suite 249, Bingham Farms, MI 48025, Joseph F. Roda, Roda & Nast, 801 Estelle Drive, Lancaster, PA 17602, Alan M. Sandals (Argued), Sandals, Langer & Taylor, 1650 Market Street One Liberty Place, 50th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Attorneys for Appellants.
Joseph J. Costello (Argued), Joseph B.G. Fay, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1701 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Joseph A. Teklits, UNISYS Corporation, P.O. Box 500, Blue Bell, PA 19424, Attorneys for Appellee.
BEFORE: MANSMANN, NYGAARD and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to review two orders granting partial summary judgment to the defendant in this ERISA action.* Review of one order requires us to interpret ERISA's statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty claims, 29 U.S.C. § 1113. Review of the other requires us to determine whether the defendant fiduciary, if found to have made material misrepresentations to the plaintiffs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
