1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 113 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 625 (2001)
 

COMPUTERXPRESS, INC. v. JACKSON

No. E027841.

113 Cal.Rptr.2d 625 (2001)

93 Cal.App.4th 993

COMPUTERXPRESS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Lee JACKSON et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

November 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Yvonne M. Renfrew and Yvonne M. Renfrew, Santa Monica, for Defendants and Appellants.

Best Best & Krieger, Douglas S. Phillips, G. Henry Welles and James C. Turney, Indian Wells, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

RICHLI, J.

Defendants appeal the denial of their motion, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (section 425.16), to strike the complaint of ComputerXpress, Inc. (ComputerXpress) as a "SLAPP" suit (strategic lawsuit against public participation). The trial court determined that none of ComputerXpress's claims was subject to section 425.16. Therefore, it did not require ComputerXpress to establish a probability of prevailing on its claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases