1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 34 P.3d
  5. 34 P.3d 690 (2001)
 

CITY OF EUGENE v. LEE

259919655, A110035

34 P.3d 690 (2001)

177 Or. App. 492

CITY OF EUGENE, Respondent, v. Daniel John LEE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 31, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Stotter, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bahr & Stotter.

Jens Schmidt, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Craig J. Capon and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.

HASELTON, P.J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct under Eugene City Code ECC section 4.725, arguing that the ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to him, under state and federal constitutional provisions protecting his rights to free speech and free religious exercise. We do not reach defendant's arguments concerning the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or his argument concerning the religion provisions of the Oregon Constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases