STATE v. VORBURGER

No. 00-0971-CR.

241 Wis.2d 481 (2001)

2001 WI App 43

624 N.W.2d 398

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bradley J. VORBURGER, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided January 25, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of David D. Cook of Law Office of David D. Cook, Monroe.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Shunette T. Campbell, assistant attorney general.

Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ.


¶ 1. DYKMAN, P.J.

Bradley J. Vorburger appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence found after he consented to a search of his car, and after Amerie Becker, his codefendant at trial, consented to a search of their apartment. Vorburger argues that evidence police obtained pursuant to the consent searches should have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases