Dr. Kramer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him was properly denied. Although Dr. Kramer made an adequate prima facie showing that he had not committed malpractice, the responding affidavit of plaintiff's expert was sufficient to raise triable issues as to whether Kramer had, in fact, been negligent in his treatment of plaintiff's symptoms, ultimately, and allegedly belatedly, attributed to ovarian cancer (cf., Alvarez v Prospect Hosp....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.