IN RE MARRIAGE OF VAN BOXTEL v. VAN BOXTEL

No. 99-0341.

242 Wis.2d 474 (2001)

2001 WI 40

625 N.W.2d 284

IN RE the MARRIAGE OF: Jami L. VAN BOXTEL, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Brent F. VAN BOXTEL, Respondent-Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 2, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the petitioner-appellant-cross-respondent-petitioner there were briefs by John Miller Carroll and John Miller Carroll, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by John Miller Carroll.

For the respondent-respondent-cross-appellant there was a brief by David J. Van Lieshout and Menn, Teetaert & Beisenstein, Ltd., Little Chute, and oral argument by David J. Van Lieshout.


¶ 1. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

In this divorce action, the petitioner, Jami L. Van Boxtel, seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals upholding the circuit court's refusal to enforce a written property division agreement between the petitioner and the respondent, Brent F. Van Boxtel.1 The petitioner asserts that the terms of the agreement are binding on the respondent and the circuit court pursuant to Wis. Stat. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases