The Special Referee's finding that defendant was not served in accordance with CPLR 311 has ample support in the record, including, in particular, the testimony of the person to whom the process was allegedly delivered. In this regard, there is simply no persuasive countervailing evidence to support plaintiffs' assertion that such person had the authority, or apparent authority, to accept service (see, Todaro v Wales Chem. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AMERICAN FEDERAL GROUP, LTD. v. UNION CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK
279 A.D.2d 433 (2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 2
AMERICAN FEDERAL GROUP, LTD., et al., Appellants, v. UNION CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 30, 2001.
Decided January 30, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
