Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The hearing evidence established that defendant was identified by the undercover officer in a confirmatory showup at the scene. Accordingly, the showup and in-court identifications were admissible (see, People v Wharton,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.