Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with the Surrogate's Court that the objectant failed to demonstrate that a decree dated July 14, 1992, should be vacated as having been procured by the fraud of the executor and his attorney (see, CPLR 5015 [a]; Dubinsky v Rykowski,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.