1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 111 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 111 Cal.Rptr.2d 582 (2001)
 

LAM v. NGO

No. G026329.

111 Cal.Rptr.2d 582 (2001)

91 Cal.App.4th 832

Tony LAM et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Ky NGO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

August 21, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyon Law and Geoffrey C. Lyon, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants.

Callahan & Blaine and Jim P. Mahacek, Santa Ana, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

I. Introduction

This appeal from the denial of an anti-SLAPP suit motion requires us to come to the following conclusions:

(1) Because the Legislature has specified that the anti-SLAPP suit law (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) is to be construed broadly, the provision in the law that a special motion to strike "may be filed within 60 days of the service of the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases