ARMONEIT v. EZELL

No. ED 79397.

59 S.W.3d 628 (2001)

Kevin ARMONEIT, Appellant, v. George EZELL, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

November 13, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray B. Marglous, James E. Lownsdale, Todd M. Boehlje, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Beth C. Boggs, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.


MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J.

Kevin Armoneit ("Employee") appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of George Ezell ("Employer"). On appeal, Employee asserts four reasons why summary judgment should not have been granted. First, Employee claims a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether Employer struck him intentionally or recklessly. Second, he contends Employer failed to meet his prima facie burden for summary judgment because Employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases