The court correctly applied the Rape Shield Law (CPL 60.42) to preclude evidence of the victim's sexual conduct with a man other than defendant earlier on the night of the crime, at a different location. Defendant's contention that the intoxicated victim could have confused defendant's conduct with what went on in the earlier incident was nothing more than speculation. Therefore, the "relevant and admissible in the interests of justice" exception to the Rape Shield Law (CPL...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
