MOSLEY v. COMM'N ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE

No. 36775.

22 P.3d 655 (2001)

Donald M. MOSLEY, Petitioner, v. NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

May 17, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Galatz Earl & Associates, Las Vegas, for Petitioner.

Sinai, Schroeder, Mooney, Boetsch, Bradley & Pace, Reno, for Respondent.

Gillock, Markley & Killebrew, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae District Judges Ritchie, Voy and Del Vecchio.

Wolfson & Glass, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae District Judges Porter, Douglas and Mahan.

Curran & Parry, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae District Judges Kathy Hardcastle and Huffaker.

Richard Segerblom, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae District Judges Denton and Cherry.

Mainor & Harris, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae District Judges Bonaventure and Mark Gibbons.

Before the Court En Banc.


OPINION

MAUPIN, C.J.

The Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline ("the Commission") is charged by the Nevada Constitution to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate allegations of judicial misconduct.1 The petitioner in this matter, Donald M. Mosley ("Judge Mosley"), is a Nevada district court judge against whom the Commission is currently conducting disciplinary proceedings. Judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases