As the motion court held, plaintiff's claim, in opposition to the motion, that the documents sought by defendant either no longer exist or were never kept in the first place is thoroughly undermined by plaintiff's principals' earlier deposition testimony that such documents do exist and indeed some were even examined subsequent to the commencement of the action. The inference is inescapable that at some point after the first of those depositions the documents in question...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.