1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 255 Conn.
  5. 255 Conn. 412 (2001)
 

ROSATO v. ROSATO

(SC 16250)

255 Conn. 412 (2001)

MARIO S. ROSATO v. BEATRICE MARTONE ROSATO

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released March 6, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beatrice Martone Rosato, pro se, the defendant.

Mark M. Wrenn, with whom, on the brief, was James P. Caulfield, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Sullivan and Flynn, Js.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal requires that we determine whether the Appellate Court improperly reversed the trial court's judgment of financial orders because of a misreading of the trial court's original order regarding the defendant's interest in the plaintiffs pension annuity benefits. Rosato v. Rosato, 40 Conn.App. 533, 536, 671 A.2d 838 (1996). Because we cannot conclusively determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases