The evidence supports the conclusion that, at the time of the dispositional hearing, respondent was not a viable permanent resource for children. Incarcerated for a violation of parole based on his failure to attend a substance abuse program, he never completed drug treatment programs, as required by the agency, and never had regular visits with the children. Nor did respondent offer anyone else as a resource while he remained in prison. That the children were not in pre...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
