DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK v. CITIBANK, N.A.

No. 99 CIV 1930 RMB THK.

211 F.Supp.2d 447 (2001)

DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 25, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John K. Crossman, Drier & Baritz, LLP, New York, NY, for Dubai Islamic Bank.

Denis J. McInerney, Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, NY, for Citibank, N.A.


DECISION AND ORDER

BERMAN, District Judge.

I. Background

Plaintiff Dubai Islamic Bank ("Plaintiff" or "DIB") objects to the Protective Order issued on April 19, 2001 by United States Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz ("Protective Order") on the following three grounds: (1) Citibank has not shown "good cause" for issuance of a protective order; (2) the Order is improper under Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases