1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 37 S.W.3d
  5. 37 S.W.3d 620 (2001)
 

WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. LONDAGIN

No. 00-1083.

37 S.W.3d 620 (2001)

344 Ark. 26

WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. Johnny LONDAGIN, Sue Londagin, and Laura Perkins.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 1, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis, Wright, Clark, Butt & Carithers, PLC, by Constance G. Clark, Fayetteville, for appellant.

Mashburn & Taylor, by Timothy J. Myers, Fayetteville, for appellees Johnny H. Londagin and Sue Londagin.

Jones, Jones & Lushbaugh, P.L.C., by Lewis D. Jones, Fayetteville, for appellee Laura Perkins.

RAY THORNTON, Justice.

We have jurisdiction of this case pursuant to Ark.Sup.Ct. R. 1-2(b)(1) and (6) because the appeal requires us to construe Rule 408 of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence as it applies to the admissibility of evidence of an effort by Wal-Mart to satisfy a customer complaint during subsequent litigation by a third party seeking to recover damages arising out of the same transaction. The trial court ruled that Rule 408 did not require exclusion of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases