The finding that appellant is a notice father only, i.e., that his consent to the child's adoption is not required and that he is entitled only to present evidence at a best interests hearing, is supported by clear and convincing evidence that appellant failed to make any meaningful efforts to communicate with the child for the entire period of his incarceration from October 1995, just after the child's birth, to December 1998, just prior to the dispositional hearing (Domestic...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
