The Surrogate correctly held that the parties' first stipulation, which provided for "interest on the pecuniary value of [the surviving spouse's] elective share in an amount * * * to be determined by the Court," was not superseded by the second stipulation, which provided for the estate's payment of a sum certain "in full satisfaction of the balance of the surviving spouse's elective share." The second stipulation only addressed matters arising after the first, and the record...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
