CRAWLEY v. CATOE

No. 00-6594.

257 F.3d 395 (2001)

Malissa Ann CRAWLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William D. CATOE, Director-Designate, Department of Corrections, State of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. American Public Health Association; South Carolina Medical Association; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; American Nurses Association; Alliance for South Carolina's Children; National Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors; South Carolina Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors; South Carolina Nurses Association; American Medical Women'S Association; National Association of Social Workers, Incorporated; Society of General Internal Medicine; American Academy on Physician and Patient; The Consortium for Substance Abusing Women and their Children; Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse; Association of Reproductive Health Professionals; National Family Preservation Network; National Center for Youth Law; Legal Services for Prisoners with Children; Institute for Health and Recovery; Now Legal Defense and Education Fund; 52 Percent; Legal Action Center, Amici Curiae.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: July 16, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Susan Frietsche, WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.

Tracey Colton Green, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

ON BRIEF: David S. Cohen, Lynn M. Paltrow, WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Seth Kreimer, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; C. Rauch Wise, Greenwood, South Carolina; David Rudovsky, KAIRYS, RUDOVSKY, EPSTEIN, MESSING & RAU, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.

Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, John W. McIntosh, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Donald J. Zelenka, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Daniel N. Abrahamson, San Francisco, California, for Amici Curiae.

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Widener wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Senior Judge Hamilton concurred.

OPINION

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

Malissa Ann Crawley appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina denying her petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Crawley's petition challenges her conviction on due process grounds, alleging that she had no notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases