1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 21 P.3d
  5. 21 P.3d 44 (2001)
 

YOUNG v. MACY

No. 93,988.

21 P.3d 44 (2001)

2001 OK 4

Rebecca S. YOUNG, C.S.R., d/b/a Verbatim Reporters, and Proof Positive, Inc., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Robert H. MACY, as District Attorney of Oklahoma County, Defendant/Appellee, and The Court Fund of Oklahoma County, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

As Corrected January 23, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lana Cohlmia and R. Robyn Assaf, Oklahoma City, for appellants.

Robert H. Macy, Oklahoma County District Attorney, John M. Jacobsen, Assistant District Attorney, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for appellee.

BOUDREAU, Justice.

¶ 1 The issue presented in this case is whether the District Attorney (DA) who subpoenaed a child to testify on behalf of the government in a criminal prosecution must pay the additional expense incurred when the child testified outside the presence of the defendant pursuant to a court order obtained under 22 O.S.1991, § 753. We hold that the DA who subpoenaed the child to testify is responsible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases