1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 146 Ohio
  5. 146 Ohio App.3d 505 (2001)
 

STATE v. TUCK

No. 3186-M.

146 Ohio App.3d 505 (2001)

2001-Ohio-7017

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. TUCK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth District, Medina County.

Decided December 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Holman, Medina County Prosecuting Attorney, and Joseph F. Salzgeber, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Edmond F. Bowers, for appellant.

WHITMORE, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Nathan G. Tuck has appealed a decision of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas which denied his motion to suppress all of the state's evidence against him. This court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} During 1996, appellant was indicted on two counts of drug trafficking in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(1) and (5).1 A warrant was issued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases