1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 39 P.3d
  5. 39 P.3d 606 (2001)
 

CANAL/NORCREST/COLUMBUS ACTION COMMITTEE v. CITY OF BOISE

No. 25962.

39 P.3d 606 (2001)

136 Idaho 666

CANAL/NORCREST/COLUMBUS ACTION COMMITTEE, an unincorporated group of affected persons, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF BOISE, an Idaho municipal corporation, acting through the Boise City Council, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, February 2001 Term.

December 28, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matt J. Howard, Boise, argued for appellant.

Randall S. Grove, Boise, argued for respondent.

WALTERS, Justice.

This appeal requires that we determine whether the City of Boise's conditional use approval of a planned unit development in a mandatory design review zone is a final decision by the City that is ripe for review. We hold that it is, and we therefore reverse the district court's dismissal of the petition for judicial review of the conditional use approval as premature.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The developer, Neighborhood Housing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases