1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 39 P.3d
  5. 39 P.3d 601 (2001)
 

STOICA v. POCOL

No. 27009.

39 P.3d 601 (2001)

136 Idaho 661

Petre STOICA, Claimant-Respondent, v. Daniel POCOL, Employer, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, November 2001 Term.

December 28, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fuller Law Office, Twin Falls, for appellant.

R. Jeff Stoker, Twin Falls, for respondent.

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an Industrial Commission case where the Commission found that an employer/employee relationship existed and that there was no basis within the statutory scheme to exempt the employer from the obligation to carry worker's compensation insurance. We affirm the decision of the Commission.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Petre Stoica was injured in a work-related accident on August 15, 1997. He had been hired by Daniel Pocol, who trained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases