ELSON v. DEFREN


279 A.D.2d 361 (2001)

719 N.Y.S.2d 246

ROBERT ELSON et al., Respondents, v. KENNETH M. DEFREN et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) HOWARD GOLDFRACHT et al., Respondents, v. KENNETH M. DEFREN et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 18, 2001.


Defendants fail to explain why the testimony of the Idaho police officers who responded to the accident is necessary or cannot be obtained by deposition, why they are concerned about not being able to implead the Idaho Department of Transportation, or otherwise show why this matter should be tried in Idaho, not New York. Favoring retention in New York is the fact that the injured plaintiffs, their wives, who assert derivative claims, and the individual defendant are all New...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases