1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 241 Wis.2d
  5. 241 Wis.2d 397 (2001)
 

STATE v. NONAHAL

No. 00-0603-CR.

241 Wis.2d 397 (2001)

2001 WI App 39

626 N.W.2d 1

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mohammed A. NONAHAL, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided January 18, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of David R. Karpe of David R. Karpe Law Office, of Madison.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Michael R. Klos, assistant attorney general.

Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ.

¶ 1. ROGGENSACK, J.

Mohammed Ali Nonahal appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle without the owner's consent as party to the crime. He claims that the circuit court violated the anti-shuttling provision of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) by returning him to federal prison despite the existence of pending charges in Wisconsin. As a result, he argues, the circuit court erred in refusing to dismiss the Wisconsin charges. Because Nonahal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases