1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 279 A.D.2d
  5. 279 A.D.2d 356 (2001)
 

SKIDELSKY v. SKIDELSKY

279 A.D.2d 356 (2001)

719 N.Y.S.2d 88

JILL C. SKIDELSKY, Respondent-Appellant, v. BARRY D. SKIDELSKY, Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 18, 2001.

The record supports the motion court's finding that the mother has not willfully interfered with the father's relationship with the child and that her continued custody of the child is otherwise in the child's best interests (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173-174). There was no need for a hearing since sufficient information to render an informed decision had been provided by the papers submitted on the instant motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases