Defendant claims that the People improperly impeached their own witness under the guise of refreshing the witness's recollection by means of his Grand Jury testimony, and that the contents of that Grand Jury testimony were thereby revealed to the jury. However, these claims are unpreserved because defendant's only contention at trial was a successful argument against receiving the Grand Jury minutes in evidence (see, People v Peterson,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.