The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warranted the conclusion that when appellant challenged the victim to fight and attempted to enter the victim's vehicle, he was intentionally aiding his companion's attempt to rob the victim. Furthermore, the evidence clearly established that the actions of appellant and his companion came within dangerous proximity of completion of a robbery (see,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
