CAROLE RING & ASSOCIATES v. NICASTRO

No. B135439.

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 519 (2001)

87 Cal.App.4th 253

CAROLE RING & ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Mario A. NICASTRO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 27, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lancaster & Associates and Michael J. Lancaster, Santa Ana, for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Daniel J. Doonan, Inc., Daniel J. Doonan, Covina, and Suzanne K. Shapiro, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


KLEIN, P.J.

Defendant and appellant Mario A. Nicastro (Nicastro) appeals an order denying attorney fees and costs after Nicastro prevailed in an arbitration brought by plaintiff and respondent Carole Ring & Associates (Ring). Nicastro seeks attorney fees and costs he incurred at the arbitration level as well as attorney fees and costs incurred in post-arbitration judicial proceedings.

The issue is whether a contract providing for arbitration and authorizing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases