DeBOLT v. EASTMAN KODAK CO

No. 01AP-55.

146 Ohio App.3d 474 (2001)

2001-Ohio-3996

DeBOLT, Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County.

Decided November 29, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Mowery & Youell, Samuel N. Lillard and Elizabeth J. Birch, for appellant.

Vorys, Sater, Seymor & Pease, LLP, W. Breck Weigel and Thomas B. Ridgley, for appellees.


PETREE, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff, William E. DeBolt, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the summary judgment motion of defendants, Eastman Kodak Company ("Kodak") and John Shatzer, on plaintiff's handicap discrimination claim.

{¶ 2} Plaintiff was employed by Kodak as a field engineer in Kodak's Customer Equipment Services Division from June 22, 1970, until his termination on February 27, 1997. As a field engineer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases