DAIGLE v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. CO.

(SC 16435)

257 Conn. 359 (2001)

EDWARD DAIGLE v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released August 7, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald F. Ochsner, for the appellant (plaintiff).

D. Lincoln Woodard, for the appellee (defendant).

SULLIVAN, C. J., and BORDEN, NORCOTT, KATZ and ZARELLA, JS.


Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court correctly granted the motion in limine of the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company, thereby precluding the plaintiff, Edward Daigle, from introducing certain of his income tax returns into evidence in order to establish his damages claim.

The Appellate Court set forth the following facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases