1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 237 F.3d
  5. 237 F.3d 371 (2001)
 

GRIGGS v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO.

Nos. 99-2508, 99-2607.

237 F.3d 371 (2001)

Joseph D. GRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Joseph D. Griggs, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: January 9, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Michael Murchison, MURCHISON, TAYLOR & GIBSON, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Raymond Michael Ripple, E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: Donna L. Goodman, E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Wilmington, Delaware; Gardner G. Courson, McGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge:

Joseph Griggs brought an action against his former employer E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company ("DuPont") under section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), see 29 U.S.C.A. § 1132(a)(3) (West 1999). Griggs claimed that DuPont breached its fiduciary duty by leading Griggs to believe that he was eligible for a tax-deferred lump sum distribution of early retirement benefits under DuPont...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases