Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the claims for contractual and common-law indemnification asserted by the defendants third-party plaintiffs. After the third-party defendant, Hudson-Shatz Painting Co., established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the defendants third-party plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding any negligence on its part (see, Martinez v Tishman Constr. Corp...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.