1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 180 F.Supp.2d
  5. 180 F.Supp.2d 411 (2001)
 

MOORE U.S.A., INC. v. STANDARD REGISTER CO.

No. 98-CV-485C(F).

180 F.Supp.2d 411 (2001)

MOORE U.S.A. INC., and Toppan Forms Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. The STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

August 27, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nixon & Vanderhye P.C. (James D. Berquist, Esq., of Counsel), Arlington, VA, Cohen Swados Wright Hanifin Bradford & Brett (Laurence B. Oppenheimer, Esq., of Counsel), Buffalo, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. (Charles L. Gholz, Esq., of Counsel), Arlington, VA, Gibson, McAskill & Crosby (Brian P. Crosby, Esq., of Counsel), Buffalo, NY, for Defendant.

CURTIN, District Judge.

On August 2, 2001, the court denied defendant Standard Register Company's ("SRC") third attempt to show that plaintiff Moore North America, Inc.("Moore") lacked standing to enforce United States Patent No. 4,918, 128 ("the '128 patent"). Item 354 ("the order of August 2"). In that order, however, the court neglected to address SRC's alternative request that its motion (Item 206) be certified for interlocutory appeal.

Interlocutory appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases