Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The "ghost" officer radioed to the arresting officer a detailed description of defendant and a continuing account of defendant's movements. The inference is inescapable that the ghost was conveying information based on his own observations, a communication from the purchasing undercover officer, or both, that a drug transaction involving defendant had occurred or was in progress (see, People v Vestal,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DARBY
287 A.D.2d 300 (2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 683
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GREGORY DARBY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 11, 2001.
Decided October 11, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
