The record supports the motion court's conclusion that in prior litigation the plaintiff and defendant, represented by her present counsel, had a joint strategy or common interest in which they were both aligned against Neways Inc. This joint strategy or common interest created a type of attorney/client privilege between plaintiff and the attorney (see generally, People v Osorio,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FEYGIN v. MARTELL
283 A.D.2d 304 (2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 614
GREGORY FEYGIN, Respondent, v. ERICA MARTELL, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. NORMAN COHEN et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 22, 2001.
Decided May 22, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
