The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification.
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motion made after the prosecutor mentioned the codefendant's guilty plea in his opening statement, the remark having been stricken, a curative instruction having been given, and the prejudice from the remark having been alleviated by such prompt...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.