Since defendant made only a general motion for a trial order of dismissal, and since the colloquy at the pre-charge conference did not relate to the issue of legal sufficiency, defendant's challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence of criminal intent regarding the two burglary incidents are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. In the first incident,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. POLANCO
279 A.D.2d 307 (2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 830
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERTO POLANCO, Also Known as JOSE MENDOZA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 11, 2001.
Decided January 11, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
