Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial when, during voir dire, the court presented a brief, objective justification of buy-and-bust operations in general in response to a prospective juror's concern that such operations were dishonest. The court's remarks aided in the selection of a fair jury and did not exhibit any bias in favor of the prosecution or preview any of the evidence against defendant. Accordingly, the court did not exceed the bounds of its supervisory role...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
